You are here

How should we end “Assistance Fund”?

Your Legal Questions Answered

How should we end “Assistance Fund”?

We are a small 501(c)(19) veterans' organization that decided 9 years ago to set up an "Assistance Fund" to try to help vets with needs that fell outside normal VA support, including educational assistance. We have had few applications and fewer that demonstrated any degree of need. We want to dissolve the fund, but realize these are restricted gifts. We see three options: 1) Relax our criteria and make grants to a wider group and/or with less demonstration of need; 2) Donate the funds to an organization with similar goals; or 3) With donor approval, move the funds to another of our projects. What do you see as the pros and cons of each and any risks or pitfalls?

I think you could do any of the three, with the proper conditions.  Since it doesn’t sound like the fund was set up as an endowment—to use the income only, and not the principal, for assistance—and since it doesn’t sound like you established strict criteria that were adopted by the donors, I think you could spend the fund down by making assistance grants even without a showing of strict financial need, while trying to help those who are most deserving. 

You could give the funds to another similar organization with the same restrictions as those that were imposed on the original gifts, although it doesn’t sound like you know exactly what those restrictions were.

If you have other important projects that need funding and know the identity of the original donors, you could ask them to release the restrictions on their donations and allow them to be used for the other projects (or for the general purposes of the organization).  To the extent that you don’t get 100% approval, you should use the remaining funds for options 1 or 2.  Whether you want to use option 3 may depend on how important the other projects are and how much work you want to do in getting individual approvals.  Expanding the applicant pool in option 1 sounds like the easiest and most closely aligned disposition of the fund, but I think you are correct that you could pursue the other options as well. 

Monday, February 23, 2015

Add new comment

Sign-up for our weekly Q&A; get a free report on electioneering