You are here

How does nonprofit president protect self upon resignation?

Your Legal Questions Answered

How does nonprofit president protect self upon resignation?

I have been the president of our homeowners association for the past 11 years but I will be selling my condo soon and resigning as president. I notified the board in January but they have basically ignored the situation. There are three other board members, and only one of those actually comes to meetings. Now, they are calling for an audit/review of the association's financials. I've put in countless hours running the association (doing literally everything). At this point I feel that if they want to "find cause" they will. One board member has even brought up lawsuits. What can I do to protect myself from frivolous and potentially costly legal action?

This sounds like one of those situations in which no good deed goes unpunished.  Your primary legal protection should already be in place, however, if the founders of your association included standard individual protections in your governing documents.  Your governing documents ought to limit your personal liability only to those situations that would involve your personal self-dealing or intentional misconduct (which I assume is not the case) and ought to include good indemnification language to protect you if you do get sued.  (See Ready Reference Page: “Bylaws Function as ‘Constitution’ of Nonprofit Corporations”)  The association should also have directors and officers insurance in place to provide the resources to protect you if you get sued.  Even if your decisions were wrong, you should not be personally liable if they were made in good faith and were what you believed to be in the best interests of the association. Careful preplanning could have reduced your risk considerably.

As a practical matter, you ought to cooperate with them as much as possible in the transition and help them find replacement members of the board to carry on when you leave.  Physicians have learned that showing concern for patients is one of the best ways to avoid malpractice litigation and those lessons should apply here. Some people are just jerks, but even they can realize eventually that litigation is seldom the answer in a situation like this.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011


I've never been on a board that didn't have a financial review whenever one of the finance officers left. In this specific case, there should be Board minutes showing approval of previous years' financial statements. The review will probably start at the month following the last Board approval. As long as the treasurer has kept the bank statements, old checks (to show dual signatures), voucher approvals from the Board to show agreement with expenditures, and invoices to show the receipts from homeowners, the review should be easy. On the other hand, if the association was run without any checks or balances, and there are no records of expenditures and receipts, the review is long since overdue.

The "no good deed goes unpunished" phenomenon seems to be pervasive. I don't understand it -- you'd think people would be grateful, but for some reason they feel entitled to the service and get punitive if someone resigns. After it happened to me, where everything I did right and all my generosity and kindness was turned on its head as a reason to condemn me, I keep reading about similar situations. Personally I will never again be generous with my help, but I wish there were a way to get a out wider warning to the careful, responsible and competent people who do so much to keep things running.

Add new comment

Sign-up for our weekly Q&A; get a free report on electioneering