You are here

Curfew on Door-to-Door Solicitation Held Unconstitutional by Circuit Court

Curfew on Door-to-Door Solicitation Held Unconstitutional by Circuit Court

Curfew on Door-to-Door Solicitation Held Unconstitutional by Circuit Court

City’s claim that rule is “narrowly tailored” to serve significant governmental interests is rejected
The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed a trial court and ruled that an ordinance that barred door-to-door solicitation after 6 p.m. is unconstitutional. After considering every justification advanced by the City of Englewood (OH), the Court said the law was not “narrowly tailored” to serve significant governmental interests. ( Ohio Citizen Action v. City of Englewood, 6th Cir., No. 10-3265, 2/2/12 .)

lock The full text of this article is available to paid subscribers only. Login or subscribe to read more

 

Sign-up for our weekly Q&A; get a free report on electioneering