New Members May Take Over Nonprofit By Paying Dues and Calling Meeting

Court says bylaws contemplate membership upon payment and new members may call special meeting to replace board

A largely dormant nonprofit corporation has been taken over by 60 new members who paid their $25 annual dues, called a special meeting of members, voted out the old board of directors and replaced them with a new slate of their own choosing. 

Report of future crime not protected under whistleblower act

The Supreme Court of Michigan has held that the state’s Whistleblower Protection Act does not protect an employee who is terminated because she reported a coworker’s plan to violate a law in the future.  The “plain language” of the Act provides protection only against retaliation for a report of an act or conduct that has actually occurred or is ongoing, the Court said.

Does Little League owe duty to spectator?

Does a Little League baseball team owe a duty to a parent-spectator who trips in a “divot” near the batting cage and breaks her leg?  By a 4-1 vote, a majority of the Supreme Court of Rhode Island has said “no”.  A single Justice has dissented.

Former Directors Lack Standing For Declaratory Action to Contest Election

Federal court dismisses complaint when plaintiffs failed to file derivative action or allege current or future personal harm

A suit contesting an election at the Association of Philippine Physicians in America Foundation has been dismissed by a federal district court in Kentucky when the plaintiffs did not follow the procedures to bring a derivative action or allege current or future personal harm.  (Pagtakhan-So v. Cueto, E.D. KY, No. 5:14-370, 2/16/16.

Former annuitants lack standing to sue trustees

Former income beneficiaries of a charitable remainder annuity trust who sold their entire interests to a for-profit company have no standing to sue the trust’s trustees and investment advisers for losses in trust value during the Great Recession, an appellate court in Nebraska has affirmed.  The Court has upheld a trial court decision granting summary judgment to the trustees and advisers.

Court denies IRS plea to avoid discovery

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has ripped the Internal Revenue Service and Justice Department lawyers for failing to comply with a discovery order in the pending class action by Tea Party organizations contesting their treatment in the classification “scandal” several years ago.  It has denied an IRS request for a writ of mandamus to overrule the District Court’s order to produce the “Be On the Lookout” lists of organizations allegedly targeted for unfavorable treatment because of their political beliefs.