Lead Stories

Court Denies Deduction for DAF Gift For Lack of Adequate Acknowledgement

Substantiation letter failed to state that recipient had “exclusive legal control” over funds

A federal District Court in Texas has upheld an IRS denial of a $1.257 million charitable contribution deduction claim for a gift to a donor advised fund because, it said, the contemporary written acknowledgment of the gift did not say the money was held under the “exclusive legal control” of the recipient charity.  The Court said that the Contemporaneous Written Acknowledgment could not be combined with the gift agreement, which provided for ultimate authority and control of the assets, to meet the requirements of the Treasury regulations.

Is Federal Sentence Enhanced For Exec’s Theft from Charity?

Seventh Circuit remands case to trial court to decide how to interpret federal sentencing guidelines

Should the federal criminal sentencing guideline be used to add an extra eight to ten months in prison for the executive director of a charity who embezzled about $150,000 from the agency when the guideline says a two-level enhancement should be applied when the offence involves “a misrepresentation that the defendant was acting on behalf of a charitable” organization?

A federal District Court in Illinois said it should be applied.  The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has said not so fast.

NRA Loses Counterclaims Against NY Attorney General

Court dismisses claims that investigation is unconstitutionally retaliatory or selective

The trial court that recently ruled that the New York Attorney General did not have grounds to force a judicial dissolution of the National Rifle Association (See Nonprofit Issues®, Vol. XXXII, No. 2) has denied counterclaims by the NRA seeking to dismiss the entire case as unconstitutionally retaliatory or selective.  The Court has ruled that the AG may continue to pursue a variety of other claims against the organization and individual defendants.

D.C. Attorney General May Sue To Dissolve Nonprofit Fiscal Sponsor

Amendment to City’s Anti-SLAPP law prevents defendants from using law for motion to dismiss

The Attorney General for the District of Columbia may proceed with a suit to dissolve a nonprofit fiscal sponsor that it claims provided more than $4 million in grants, constituting more than 99% of its total grantmaking, to a related for-profit corporation, the District’s Court of Appeals has ruled.

Court Says Racial Slurs Against Black Health Aide Did Not Create Hostile Work Environment

“An objectively reasonable caretaker would not have been detrimentally affected” by patient’s use of N-word “all the time”

A federal District Court in Pennsylvania has dismissed a hostile work environment claim brought against a behavioral health facility by a black woman aide because “an objectively reasonable caretaker would not have been detrimentally affected” by her patient’s regular race-based harassment.

NY AG May Not Sue to Dissolve National Rifle Association

Trial court allows claims to proceed against individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duty

A trial court in New York has dismissed a complaint brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James seeking to dissolve the National Rifle Association for its failure to oversee top executives and prevent the loss of millions of dollars improperly spent by its leaders.  But the Court has allowed the AG to continue to prosecute various claims against the individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duty and other offenses.