Lead Stories

One-man sperm bank not charitable

The Tax Court has agreed with the IRS that a nonprofit sperm bank distributing the sperm of a single man does not advance the public health and is therefore not qualified for 501(c)(3) charitable exemption.

William C. Naylor, Jr., a software engineer who holds more than 10 patents on various inventions, created a nonprofit public benefit corporation in California in 2003.  Its purpose was to provide free sperm from Naylor to women seeking to become pregnant through artificial insemination or in vitro fertilization.  He advertised the availability on the Internet.

Faction Within Nonprofit Can’t Hire Lawyers for Entity

Court must strike pleadings filed by attorneys who can’t prove authority to act for corporation

A Court of Appeals in Texas has ruled that a trial court must strike pleadings filed on behalf of a nonprofit corporation when the attorneys who filed the case were selected by one faction within the organization and cannot show authority to act on behalf of the corporation.  (In Re: Salazar, Ct. of App., TX, Second Dist., No. 2-09-405, CV, 6/25/10.)

News Flash: Insured Must Read Policy Upon Receipt

Failure to read “insured vs. insured” exclusion precludes summary judgment against agent

The nonprofit National Association of Investors Corporation (“NAIC”) had obtained the same directors and officers insurance policy from its insurance agent each year from the 1990s through 2004.  The policy contained the standard “insured vs. insured” provision excluding coverage for a claim brought by one individual insured under the policy against another insured by the policy.

Diocese’s Pooled Investment Fund Available to Creditors in Bankruptcy

Diocese held funds in trust for many organizations but could not precisely trace the separate investments

The separate assets of 31 Catholic churches, schools, cemeteries and other charities held in a pooled investment account of the Catholic Diocese of Wilmington (DE) are available to pay the debts of the Diocese in bankruptcy, according to the bankruptcy court in Delaware.  The Diocese held the funds in trust for the benefit of the organizations, but could not meet the burden of specifically tracing the funds, the Court said.  The entire fund (with one exception for a group with a different arrangement) was therefore available for the general creditors of the Diocese.  (In

Nonprofit Law YOU Want to Know

We regularly feature answers to questions from readers in our “To the Point” column. The full list can be viewed here. Here are a few questions recently received from readers.

Can only rich form 501(c)(3)?

I am interested in starting up a 501(c)(3) but have read that none of the principals of the organization are allowed to obtain monetary or material benefit.  If that is the case, how does anyone on the board get paid? Can only rich people form a (c)(3)?  --From the Website.

Court Refuses to Consider Start-up As Successor to Hearing Dog Program

Trust fund given to SPCA for substantially reduced effort even though staff left to begin full-service program based on old model

Article Archives >> Lead Stories >> September 16-October 15, 2010

Preview of Article:

Court Refuses to Consider Start-up
As Successor to Hearing Dog Program
Trust fund given to SPCA for substantially reduced effort
even though staff left to begin full-service program based on old model

At the time that Gloria Berry, surviving beneficiary of a trust jointly established with her husband, died in 2007, the San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ran a program known as Hearing Dogs for the Deaf.  It was a comprehensive program to obtain and train dogs to alert their owners to important sounds such as smoke alarms, doorbells, telephone and alarm clocks.  With a full time staff of three and several part-timers, the SPCA trained and evaluated the dogs, provided follow-up training for dogs and their owners, provided supplies and did specific fundraising for the program.