Finding Substantial Burden Under RLUIPA Is Task For Court
Whether a local land use regulation imposes a substantial burden on the free exercise of religion is a question of law for the court and not a question of fact for a jury, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has held. It has joined the reasoning of the First and Sixth Circuits in determining that the decision-maker under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”) is the court and not the jury.