Lead Stories

Court Refuses to Terminate Small Trust for Charities

Trustee’s fees equaling 30% of income were not unforeseen by donor, it says

Despite the recommendation of the state Attorney General to terminate a $600,000 trust for the benefit of three separate charities because of a high proportion of trustee’s fees, the Appellate Court of Illinois has refused to terminate the trust.  It has reversed a trial court decision authorizing the termination.  (Church of the Little Flower v. US Bank, No. 4-12-0266, 11/5/12.)

Erma Donelan established a trust in 1991, with income and emergency funds to herself for life.  Any assets exceeding $750,000 at her death were to be distributed 20% to Church of the Little Flower, 20% to St. Joseph’s Home, and 60% to Friends of the Sisters of St. Francis, now a Foundation.  Property worth $750,000 was to retained in further trust to pay 7% income to her four sisters-in-law, with any remainder worth more than $500,000 at the death of the last of them to be held in further trust for the three charities.

Tax Court denies another easement deduction

The Tax Court has denied another deduction for the gift of a conservation easement to a charitable land trust.  The Court denied the deduction on the ground that the easement was not protected in perpetuity because an existing mortgage was not subordinate to the easement.  The Court denied the deduction even though the bank subsequently agreed to a subordination agreement.

Charity Bequests Not Adeemed By Gift of Stock Before Death

Court refuses to find “latent ambiguity” based on evidence produced in litigation

Family beneficiaries of the estate of Charles R. Walgreen, Jr. have been unable to convince two Illinois courts that gifts of 10,000 shares of stock in the Walgreen drugstore company designated to two Rotary Foundations in his will and trust were made before he died and should not be made out of shares in his estate.  The courts have refused to find a “latent ambiguity” in his estate documents based on the evidence produced in the litigation.  (Koulogeorge v. Campbell, App. Cit. IL, First Dist., Fourth Div., No. 1-11-2812, 12/31/12.)

Church Must Pay to Defend Foodbank Under Indemnification Clause

Church’s insurance does not cover contract to protect Foodbank against volunteer’s claim

A Los Angeles church has been ordered to pay $62,000 to the Los Angeles Regional Food Bank pursuant to the indemnification clause in the contract under which it obtained food to distribute to needy families.  The Foodbank had spent that much in defending itself against a negligence claim bought by a volunteer for the Church who was injured while picking up food at the Foodbank’s warehouse.  (New Life in Christ Full Gospel Church v. Los Angeles Regional Food Bank, Ct. of App., CA, Second Dist., Div. 7, No. B232701, 12/27/12.)

Volunteer May Sue Nonprofits For Harassment Under Title VII

Court says that compensation is not necessary to be classified as “employee” under employment law

A federal District Court in Illinois has allowed a woman volunteer for two nonprofit emergency ambulance services to sue for sexual harassment and discrimination under the employee protection provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.  The Court has rejected the defense that compensation is required to bring a worker within the employment discrimination protections of the Act.  (Volling v. Antioch Rescue Squad, N.D. IL, No.