Lead Stories

The Supreme Court of Illinois has allowed the Rush University Medical Center in Chicago to pursue a claim against a trust created by a donor who died without fulfilling his irrevocable pledge for $1.5 million.  The Court said that a trust created by the donor/settlor naming himself as beneficiary could be liable for the debt even though it contained a spendthrift clause saying its assets could not be used to pay claims of creditors. The Court said the common law rule was not abrogated by the state’s enactment of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act.

A frequent patron of Merchants’ Square in the historic district of Colonial Williamsburg has been permitted to bring a suit against the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation to remove barriers to accessibility.  The patron lives in Gloucester, Virginia and claims he visits the Square several times a month but cannot enjoy all of the services and facilities because it is not fully accessible to the wheelchair he uses for mobility.

We regularly feature answers to questions from readers in our “Your Legal Questions Answered” column. The full list can be viewed on the site.

May we transfer endowment to another charity?

A court-appointed receiver for Ponzi-schemer Thomas J. Petters and his affiliated companies has no standing to sue to recover gifts under the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act, even where the government is one of the creditors, a federal District Court in Minnesota has ruled.  It has also held that the receiver was barred by the newly passed state statute of limitations from recovering a $2 million gift from a Petters foundation to College of St. Benedict.  (Kelley v. College of St. Benedict, D. MN, No. 12-822, 10/26/12.)

Despite the recommendation of the state Attorney General to terminate a $600,000 trust for the benefit of three separate charities because of a high proportion of trustee’s fees, the Appellate Court of Illinois has refused to terminate the trust.  It has reversed a trial court decision authorizing the termination.  (Church of the Little Flower v. US Bank, No. 4-12-0266, 11/5/12.)

Erma Donelan established a trust in 1991, with income and emergency funds to herself for life.  Any assets exceeding $750,000 at her death were to be distributed 20% to Church of the Little Flower, 20% to St. Joseph’s Home, and 60% to Friends of the Sisters of St. Francis, now a Foundation.  Property worth $750,000 was to retained in further trust to pay 7% income to her four sisters-in-law, with any remainder worth more than $500,000 at the death of the last of them to be held in further trust for the three charities.

An appellate court in Georgia has allowed a residual beneficiary of her mother’s trust to sue a University to recover a $1 million contribution allegedly given by the trustee without authority.  It has affirmed a trial court decision refusing to dismiss the claim. (Reinhardt University v. Castleberry, Ct. of App. GA, No. A12A1651, 11/8/12.)